My Blog List

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Super, mega, ultra, annual blog #15: Reflection

 Since I started Lagcc in september, I have learned more about the world and people in general. School was kind of a foreign environment to me; I didn't go to much school so it was definitly new being in a class room environment. The Sal typing this blog right now feels much more comfortable with the whole topic of school then the Sal in september. Fortunately I have good class mates and great teachers who make school a comfortable place for me and not a source of anxiety; like it once was.

  I have learned more about myself for sure. Before coming to this school, I had my mind set on a certain academic program. Of course I did not enroll in that program, but I met other people who had experience in that field and they gave me some valuable insight. The course of my life has changed. I decided to explore other options instead of resigning to one particular field. I am in no rush.

 I guess you could say the Sal writing this blog is a bit more experienced then the Sept-Sal. I have branched out and tryed to experience as many different things as i could. Ranging from extra carricular activities to even new foods; I have tryed to take the opportunity of being around so many different cultures at Lagcc to broaden my horizons.

 Sept-Sal would have also been more pessamistic then current Sal. I have restored hope for the world and for myself since having a over all positive experience in college. I have met new friends, established new connections, got back into a more positive routine, and most importantly I have become richer for having these experiences. It is a deeply satisfying feeling knowing that you are living your life in a positive way, for positive energy attracts positive energy. Negativity only attracts more negativity, so being in a positive environment is all Sept-Sal would have asked for; but he wasn't expecting it.

 Life is what you make of it. The lessons I have learned at Lagcc are part of my quest for self discovery. You got to try on a few hats before you find one that suits you, right? I would have liked to have learned more from a academic stand point, but my collegiate carreer is still in its infancy. I am in no rush.

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Super, Mega, Ultra, Major research paper.

English 103
Dr Luke Vasileiou
Salvatore Saviano
15 November 2010
                                 Network: Reality, Illusion or both?
Have you ever seen a movie that moved you on many different levels? A movie that had hope, fear, reality, fantasy and a surprise ending; I believe Network had it all. This movie takes place in New York, 1975. It is a cynical view on corporate America, ideology, how a television network is run and the process that management goes through when making executive decisions. Since depicting corporate America, naturally, it is quite ugly. The movie may seem to be a completely fictional story, but the realities behind it are truly scary. Network is widely regarded as a masterpiece in the field of cinema. There have been few movies that capture the dark qualities of our society, while keeping them with in believable parameters. When comparing Network to the real nineteen seventies culture, I find that it was surprisingly on point despite the dark image the movie cast on society. Of course we have to make provisions for the lack of disco references. When examining the way people interacted and communicated on a social level in Network, I find it to be dark and accurate indeed.
During the nineteen seventies, New York and America were undergoing serious change. There were social and political events taking place that was reshaping society. There was an economic recession during the mid nineteen seventies and there were many contributing factors. One being the end of the economic boom America was going through since the end of world war two and the beginning of a recession. Another factor was the oil crisis and energy crisis that the New York and the whole world were feeling. (1).
1861                                                                         1916                                                                    1971                                           2006
                                              Oil consumption chart. Source:  Energy Information Administration (2)

 The economy was not showing signs of improvement, and there seemed to be no light at the end of the tunnel. Most people were already living in poverty, and times were just getting harder.   
                   
                            Graph depicting the economic recession of the seventies. (3)

Society was in upheaval as civilians began developing an attitude gearing towards change. Former President Richard Nixon resigned from his position as commander and chief. This was largely due to the Watergate scandal (4); a heinous act of dishonesty that epitomized the executive mentality in this country perfectly. The Republican Party that sponsored Nixon hired five men to break into the democratic national committee headquarters in hopes of tipping the scales in Nixon’s favor; showing blatant disregard of ethics and morals. Even the highest ranking government officials were as corrupt as a modern day mobster. Every country has the government that they deserve; so what does that say about seventies society? Nixon resigned to avoid any further disgrace and embarrassment and relinquished his role as leader of the country to vice president Gerald Ford (4).
Gerald Ford finished Nixon’s term as president but did not seem to gain any more popularity. There were two attempts on Gerald Ford’s life with in a three week time span in nineteen seventy five while he was dealing with the financial crisis that New York was going through (5).  During that year, Gerald Ford made it a top priority to fix the financial crisis that New York was going through during the seventies. He made a public speech in Washington D.C claiming that New Yorkers were suffering financially due to improper management. He claimed the city was being run completely inefficiently and blamed the state government for improperly managing their funds. He was against the government bailing out the city because " The primary beneficiaries would be the New York officials who would thus escape responsibility for their past follies and be further excused from making the hard decisions necessary to restore the cities fiscal integrity" (7) Gerald Ford is basically saying that the executives who run New York were irresponsible and caused the cities financial perils and that he would not bail them out with a easy fix. His decisions reflected his concern for the long term safety of New York. 
The civil rights movement was in full swing in New York, as women fought for feminist rights. There was a feeling of awareness that was unlocked with in every one during the late sixties and it carried over into the nineteen seventies. This was evident by the sudden need for expression within the public. Either there was more injustices occurring than ever, or society was “mad as hell and they weren’t going to take it any more” as Howard Beale put it. Other social groups also began to fight for their rights in the seventies.
It started in nineteen sixty nine in New York; gay Americans were forced to live underground; they were forced to live two separate lives because homo sexuality was illegal. There were gay clubs and bars placed throughout New York by mobsters who would gladly profit off of discrimination. Police routinely would raid these bars and clubs until the gays fought back one night and didn’t stop protesting for three days.(5) The first gay pride parade was held in 1971 in New York relatively shortly after the fiasco. Later, in 1973, homosexuals succeeded in officially removing homosexuality from the list of mental dieses (5).
 Census data shows that a majority of New Yorkers were not living in the middle class range, but the lower class range at this time. Approximately 19.7 percent of New Yorkers fell into salary range of 19,000 – 25,000$.  39.2 percent of citizens made between 10,000$ and 25,000$.  45 percent of New Yorkers made less than 10,000$ a year. This was portrayed accurately in the movie, where it suggested on numerous occasions that money was scarce, and people were experiencing dark times both socially and financially (6).
 The television was destined to become a powerful weapon and important tool for social change during the seventies.The east coast has the most influence over what gets aired through out the country. Ninety five percent of people in New York owned a television (that’s 5.6 million people) with roughly nine percent of people falling into the category of “below poverty level” (that’s about three hundred and fifty six thousand) (6). As Howard Beale said in Network “This tube can make or break presidents, popes, prime ministers... This tube is the most awesome God-damned force in the whole godless world, and woe is us if it ever falls in to the hands of the wrong people”. Howard Beale was well aware of corporate incentives and corruption and was trying desperate to make everyone else aware of it too. With the depressing economy and social inequities evident in all facets of society, people were expressing their feelings discontent.
There was very little compassion in the society portrayed in Network. In the opening scene of the movie, Howard Beale, a newscaster for the U.B.S network, announces on the air that he is going to lose his job due to poor ratings and has decided to end his life. He even makes a comment about his suicide being good for ratings; which projected his spite and disdain for the Network.  Naturally, any one in touch with their emotions could tell what state of mind he was in; depressed, psychotic and lost. The network brass however, was initially outraged. Then, after inspecting the ratings, they decided that a angry, loose cannon on television was exactly what the network needed to boost their ratings and finally turn over a profit.
“I don’t want conventional programming; I want television that will articulate the rage of the public”. This social commentary highlights New Yorkers tendency towards sycophantic programming. At the time, there were only three broadcasting networks in the country so it was highly competitive. The east coast, New York particularly was the largest market share so that’s who the networks gear their programming towards. This is a accurate portrayal, considering televisions history of producing low cost, high profit and low quality programming.
The social realities of the film seemed to be fairly accurate. Generally speaking, the common man portrayed in the movie was well represented. Poor people lived in poor neighborhoods and wealthy people lived in wealthy neighborhoods.  The movie shows the segregation of class throughout New York City in the seventies; you see wealthy business executives being chauffeured around in beautiful, shiny cars. You also see the angry masses chanting in unison from there balconies and out there windows “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not gonna take this anymore”. The complexes range from project buildings, smaller apartment complexes, to small family homes. The message was clear however; the citizens of New York City were upset at the way their society was developing and they vocalized it. This is accurate based on my research of the many civil rights movements going on and the numbers back it up.
Economically speaking, Network director Sidney Lumet, went out of his way to make sure the viewers understood the dire economic straits of the time.  In virtually every scene possible, the poor economic, political and social situation was stressed. Whenever the Executives of the network meet, they take into consideration the low profits of their programming and try to deliver cheap programs that are going to take people’s minds off of the recession and corrupt politicians. If someone was to question the ethics behind their programming, they would not hesitate to threaten to fire them citing “good luck finding a job in this economy”. That also goes back to the social realities of the time; virtually no compassion between their fellow man. It’s like every one lives together with the same problems, but still cannot find common ground and a reason to place ethics above monetary incentives.
Politically speaking; Network made the bold claim that “democracy is dead” and only corporate practices exist. Coverage of the political scandals of the times has become repetitive to their target audience; society had acknowledged the unfortunate political situation.
You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and I won't have it!! Is that clear?! You think you've merely stopped a business deal. That is not the case. The Arabs have taken billions of dollars out of this country, and now they must put it back! It is ebb and flow, tidal gravity! It is ecological balance! You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no third worlds. There is no West. There is only one holistic system of systems, one vast and immane, interwoven, interacting, multivariate, multi-national dominion of dollars. Petro-dollars, electro-dollars, multi-dollars, Reichmarks, Yen, Rubles, Pounds, and Shekels. It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today."
 –Arthur Jensen: a fictional character and president of the UBS Company. I believe this to be case back then and still to this day; society has not come that far.
The inhuman way of approaching Howard’s suicidal situation represented in my mind, an accurate portrayal of corporate protocol. It shows where their priorities were; not with the individual but with the profits of the corporation.  It is understandable to be concerned with profits; after all it is the lifeblood of any business, but what is not ethical by any means is the exploitation of such an event. They were not even viewing Howard as a man with problems. They viewed his pain as a tool they could use to create a connection to the “angry public” and increase their ratings. This kind of inhuman like behavior was the clear and blatant motif throughout the movie. I believe this is an accurate portrayal of what would happen if such an event was to occur. 
The influence television has over our society is scary. New York is the flag ship for modern television stations; meaning what airs in New York is likely to be aired all over  the country. The east coast is extremely important when it comes to broadcasting; a show airing in New York can make or break a television station.. Most people in the world, not just New York watch television; it was the most powerful mass medium at the time and as such, was very volatile.
 “You're beginning to believe the illusions we're spinning here, you're beginning to believe that the tube is reality and your own lives are unreal. You do. Why, whatever the tube tells you: you dress like the tube, you eat like the tube, you raise your children like the tube, you even think like the tube. This is mass madness, you maniacs. In God's name, you people are the real thing, WE are the illusion.” –Howard Beale. I know a lot of people who grew up receiving an education from television rather than school and I can assure you, it warps your perception of reality. It narrows the human perspective by showing you what is to be expected as normal.
 Next time you watch television and notice a political debate or a commercial, analyze it. Don’t accept what is presented before you as reality; dig deeper and think about why you are being presented this information. The conclusion you will draw will not be a happy vision; you will see that politicians lie, ads spin the truth and none of it is produced with you, the consumer’s best interest in mind. It is all in order to make money; we inherently understand that, but do we know the consequences of such ambitions? Look around next time you walk outside, buy a news paper, read the internet and you’ll see them for yourself.

"1970s - Oil Crisis." Enlightenment - The Experience Festival. Web. 23 Nov. 2010. http://www.experiencefestival.com/1970s_-_oil_crisis  (1)

U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - Independent Statistics and Analysis. Web. 23 Nov. 2010. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/>. (2)

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) - Bea.gov . Web. 23 Nov. 2010. <http://www.bea.gov/>. (3)

Bombing, By German. "On This Day: President Gerald Ford Survives Second Assassination Attempt." Web. 23 Nov. 2010. <http://209.73.4.141/news/on-this-day/September-October-08/On-this-Day--Sara-Jane-Moore-Attempts-to-Assassinate-President-Gerald-Ford.html>. (4)

"Gay Liberation Movement - Page 2 | St. James Encyclopedia of Pop Culture." Find Articles at BNET | News Articles, Magazine Back Issues & Reference Articles on All Topics. Web. 23 Nov. 2010. <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_g1epc/is_tov/ai_2419100495/pg_2/?tag=content;col1>. (5)

"Access Denied." Web. 23 Nov. 2010. <http://www.socialexplorer.com/pub/reportdata/htmlresults.aspx?ReportId=R10004034&ItemsPerPage=100>. (6)

Ford, Gerald. "Vital Speeches of the Day." Speech. Washington D.C. Academic Search Complete. Web(7)


Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Super, Mega, Ultra, Major research paper


English 103
Dr Luke Vasileiou
Salvatore Saviano
15 November 2010
                                 Network: Reality, Illusion or both?
Have you ever seen a movie that moved you on many different levels? A movie that had hope, fear, reality, fantasy and a surprise ending; I believe Network had it all. This movie takes place in New York, 1975. It is a cynical view on corporate America, ideology, how a television network is run and the process that management goes through when making executive decisions. Since depicting corporate America, naturally, it is quite ugly. The movie may seem to be a completely fictional story, but the realities behind it are truly scary. Network is widely regarded as a masterpiece in the field of cinema. There have been few movies that capture the dark qualities of our society, while keeping them with in believable parameters. When comparing Network to the real nineteen seventies culture, I find that it was surprisingly on point despite the dark image the movie cast on society. Of course we have to make provisions for the lack of disco references. When examining the way people interacted and communicated on a social level in Network, I find it to be dark and accurate indeed.
During the nineteen seventies, New York and America were undergoing serious change. There were social and political events taking place that was reshaping society. There was an economic recession during the mid nineteen seventies and there were many contributing factors. One being the end of the economic boom America was going through since the end of world war two and the beginning of a recession. Another factor was the oil crisis and energy crisis that the New York and the whole world were feeling. (1).
1861                                                                         1916                                                                    1971                                           2006
                                              Oil consumption chart. Source:  Energy Information Administration (2)

 The economy was not showing signs of improvement, and there seemed to be no light at the end of the tunnel. Most people were already living in poverty, and times were just getting harder.   
                   
                            Graph depicting the economic recession of the seventies. (3)

Society was in upheaval as civilians began developing an attitude gearing towards change. Former President Richard Nixon resigned from his position as commander and chief. This was largely due to the Watergate scandal (4); a heinous act of dishonesty that epitomized the executive mentality in this country perfectly. The Republican Party that sponsored Nixon hired five men to break into the democratic national committee headquarters in hopes of tipping the scales in Nixon’s favor; showing blatant disregard of ethics and morals. Even the highest ranking government officials were as corrupt as a modern day mobster. Every country has the government that they deserve; so what does that say about seventies society? Nixon resigned to avoid any further disgrace and embarrassment and relinquished his role as leader of the country to vice president Gerald Ford (4).
Gerald Ford finished Nixon’s term as president but did not seem to gain any more popularity. There were two attempts on Gerald Ford’s life with in a three week time span in nineteen seventy five (5). The first attempt was in Sacramento, California where a female attempted to shoot him as he was walking but the gun didn’t go off. She was still sentenced to life in prison. Three weeks later, a former FBI informant, Sarah Jane Moore pulled out a gun from her purse while attending a speech ford was giving to the foreign affairs committee in San Francisco. She fired once, but it was high and a disabled former marine stopped her from getting off a second shot (4) All over the country, there was outrage and anger. In New York, social change was more important than political change.
The civil rights movement was in full swing in New York, as women fought for feminist rights. There was a feeling of awareness that was unlocked with in every one during the late sixties and it carried over into the nineteen seventies. This was evident by the sudden need for expression within the public. Either there was more injustices occurring than ever, or society was “mad as hell and they weren’t going to take it any more” as Howard Beale put it. Other social groups also began to fight for their rights in the seventies.
It started in nineteen sixty nine in New York; gay Americans were forced to live underground; they were forced to live two separate lives because homo sexuality was illegal. There were gay clubs and bars placed throughout New York by mobsters who would gladly profit off of discrimination. Police routinely would raid these bars and clubs until the gays fought back one night and didn’t stop protesting for three days.(5) The first gay pride parade was held in 1971 in New York relatively shortly after the fiasco. Later, in 1973, homosexuals succeeded in officially removing homosexuality from the list of mental dieses (5).
 Census data shows that a majority of New Yorkers were not living in the middle class range, but the lower class range at this time. Approximately 19.7 percent of New Yorkers fell into salary range of 19,000 – 25,000$.  39.2 percent of citizens made between 10,000$ and 25,000$.  45 percent of New Yorkers made less than 10,000$ a year. This was portrayed accurately in the movie, where it suggested on numerous occasions that money was scarce, and people were experiencing dark times both socially and financially (6).
 The television was destined to become a powerful weapon and important tool for social change during the seventies. Ninety five percent of people in New York owned a television (that’s 5.6 million people) with roughly nine percent of people falling into the category of “below poverty level” (that’s about three hundred and fifty six thousand) (6). As Howard Beale said in Network “This tube can make or break presidents, popes, prime ministers... This tube is the most awesome God-damned force in the whole godless world, and woe is us if it ever falls in to the hands of the wrong people”. Howard Beale was well aware of corporate incentives and corruption and was trying desperate to make everyone else aware of it too. With the depressing economy and social inequities evident in all facets of society, people were expressing their feelings discontent.
There was very little compassion in the society portrayed in Network. In the opening scene of the movie, Howard Beale, a newscaster for the U.B.S network, announces on the air that he is going to lose his job due to poor ratings and has decided to end his life. He even makes a comment about his suicide being good for ratings; which projected his spite and disdain for the Network.  Naturally, any one in touch with their emotions could tell what state of mind he was in; depressed, psychotic and lost. The network brass however, was initially outraged. Then, after inspecting the ratings, they decided that a angry, loose cannon on television was exactly what the network needed to boost their ratings and finally turn over a profit.
“I don’t want conventional programming; I want television that will articulate the rage of the public”. This social commentary highlights New Yorkers tendency towards sycophantic programming. At the time, there were only three broadcasting networks in the country so it was highly competitive. The east coast, New York particularly was the largest market share so that’s who the networks gear their programming towards. This is a accurate portrayal, considering televisions history of producing low cost, high profit and low quality programming.
The social realities of the film seemed to be fairly accurate. Generally speaking, the common man portrayed in the movie was well represented. Poor people lived in poor neighborhoods and wealthy people lived in wealthy neighborhoods.  The movie shows the segregation of class throughout New York City in the seventies; you see wealthy business executives being chauffeured around in beautiful, shiny cars. You also see the angry masses chanting in unison from there balconies and out there windows “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not gonna take this anymore”. The complexes range from project buildings, smaller apartment complexes, to small family homes. The message was clear however; the citizens of New York City were upset at the way their society was developing and they vocalized it. This is accurate based on my research of the many civil rights movements going on and the numbers back it up.
Economically speaking, Network director Sidney Lumet, went out of his way to make sure the viewers understood the dire economic straits of the time.  In virtually every scene possible, the poor economic, political and social situation was stressed. Whenever the Executives of the network meet, they take into consideration the low profits of their programming and try to deliver cheap programs that are going to take people’s minds off of the recession and corrupt politicians. If someone was to question the ethics behind their programming, they would not hesitate to threaten to fire them citing “good luck finding a job in this economy”. That also goes back to the social realities of the time; virtually no compassion between their fellow man. It’s like every one lives together with the same problems, but still cannot find common ground and a reason to place ethics above monetary incentives.
Politically speaking; Network made the bold claim that “democracy is dead” and only corporate practices exist. Coverage of the political scandals of the times has become repetitive to their target audience; society had acknowledged the unfortunate political situation. “You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and I won't have it!! Is that clear?! You think you've merely stopped a business deal. That is not the case. The Arabs have taken billions of dollars out of this country, and now they must put it back! It is ebb and flow, tidal gravity! It is ecological balance! You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no third worlds. There is no West. There is only one holistic system of systems, one vast and immane, interwoven, interacting, multivariate, multi-national dominion of dollars. Petro-dollars, electro-dollars, multi-dollars, Reichmarks, Yen, Rubles, Pounds, and Shekels. It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today.” –Arthur Jensen: a fictional character and president of the UBS Company.  I believe this to be case back then and still to this day; society has not come that far.
The inhuman way of approaching Howard’s suicidal situation represented in my mind, was an accurate portrayal of corporate protocol. It shows where their priorities were; not with the individual but with the profits of the corporation.  It is understandable to be concerned with profits; after all it is the lifeblood of any business, but what is not ethical by any means is the exploitation of such an event. They were not even viewing Howard as a man with problems. They viewed his pain as a tool they could use to create a connection to the “angry public” and increase their ratings. This kind of inhuman like behavior was the clear and blatant motif throughout the movie. I believe this is an accurate portrayal of what would happen if such an event was to occur. 
Even though Network was a supposed to be a cynical view on our society, I believe it was one of the most accurate portrayals of American culture. Most movies have a story line that revolves around noble causes and heroic deeds; Network however revolved around the opposite, but that is reality. Our society is filled with a lot more injustice then happy endings. It is not realistic for movies to end happily when so often in life, situations do not end up the way we want them too. Largely due to existential factors, like social and political barriers.
The influence television has over our society is scary. Most people watch television; it was the most powerful mass medium at the time and as such, was very volatile. “You're beginning to believe the illusions we're spinning here, you're beginning to believe that the tube is reality and your own lives are unreal. You do. Why, whatever the tube tells you: you dress like the tube, you eat like the tube, you raise your children like the tube, you even think like the tube. This is mass madness, you maniacs. In God's name, you people are the real thing, WE are the illusion.” –Howard Beale. I know a lot of people who grew up receiving an education from television rather than school and I can assure you, it warps your perception of reality. It narrows your perspective by telling you what’s normal and how you should think. If people could avoid falling into this bear trap laid by corporate America, we would have the will power and knowledge to efficiently fight social, political and economic injustice. This was the point I believe Network was trying to make.
Next time you watch television and notice a political debate or even a commercial, analyze it. Don’t accept what is presented before you as reality; dig deeper and think about why you are being presented this information. The conclusion you will draw will not be a happy vision; you will see that politicians lie, ads spin the truth and none of it is produced with you, the consumer’s best interest in mind. It is all in order to make money; we inherently understand that, but do we know the consequences of such ambitions? Look around next time you walk outside, buy a news paper, read the internet and you’ll see them for yourself.
"1970s - Oil Crisis." Enlightenment - The Experience Festival. Web. 23 Nov. 2010. http://www.experiencefestival.com/1970s_-_oil_crisis  (1)

U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - Independent Statistics and Analysis. Web. 23 Nov. 2010. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/>. (2)

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) - Bea.gov . Web. 23 Nov. 2010. <http://www.bea.gov/>. (3)

Bombing, By German. "On This Day: President Gerald Ford Survives Second Assassination Attempt." Web. 23 Nov. 2010. <http://209.73.4.141/news/on-this-day/September-October-08/On-this-Day--Sara-Jane-Moore-Attempts-to-Assassinate-President-Gerald-Ford.html>. (4)

"Gay Liberation Movement - Page 2 | St. James Encyclopedia of Pop Culture." Find Articles at BNET | News Articles, Magazine Back Issues & Reference Articles on All Topics. Web. 23 Nov. 2010. <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_g1epc/is_tov/ai_2419100495/pg_2/?tag=content;col1>. (5)

"Access Denied." Web. 23 Nov. 2010. <http://www.socialexplorer.com/pub/reportdata/htmlresults.aspx?ReportId=R10004034&ItemsPerPage=100>. (6)




Monday, November 15, 2010

Super, Mega, Ultra Minority blog report

  I believe that if the system was better then the prior system, then it should stay. What was the old system? Jail is a revolving door. Its a business run with profit/loss ratios like any thing else. This should not be the system we have in place if its going to promote corrupt behavior and corruption is inevitable when you have monetary incentives. The pre cog system was built on the idea of abolishing murder. It wasn't conceived with the notion of profits, so that makes the pre cog system of purer intent then the former one. Naturally when your have purer intent your also going to have more effeciency.
 So what if it wasn't perfect; there are many imperfect systems out there. Its a matter of weighing out the pro's and con's of the new and old; were there more innocent people put away in the older system or the newer one? Were the confines more or less pleasant overall for the prisoner? Does the new system work better then the old one? And the winner is, by unanimous decision, the pre cog system.
  The only fucked up thing was the imprisonment and sedation of the precogs. That shit wasn't cool. These humans were gifted with some thing powerful. Spidermans uncle always said "with great power comes great responsibility". I dont think he would want Peter to run around saving people, and he wouldnt want agatha to give up her life/freedom in order for her murderous dreams to be projected on a big screen t.v. We cannot treat any human like a slave, no matter what there potential; it's still there decision and she didn't seem too happy floating around in that pond.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Super, mega, ultra MOMI adventure.

 When I went to the museum, the first exhibit I saw was about commercialism. The first thing i saw was Star magazine covers from the last century. I saw hollywoods attempt at creating celebrities in its earliest form. At some point -probably when the first star magazine was in circulation- studios realized people will pay money to see certain  familiar celebrities. Rather than focus on innovating in the industry, Hollywood focused on hyping up the actors and actresses. This made the actors very famous, rich, and powerful. I saw the earliest attempts of this strategy right when I walked in the door.

 The next thing I saw was a display of all the bi-products of fantasy movies; there were board games, stuffed animals and anything else that can be dubbed a "collectable". It was commercialism at its finest. On display were the accomplishments of different film studios, but all I was seeing was glorified consumerism. The tour guide informed us that some movies gross more money off of merchandise then the actual film. So I’m thinking to myself  "oh great, they're gonna try and sell me a bunch of crap". Fortunately, the tour got more informative. There was more, and it didn’t have to do with buying crap.

 She took us to a video game area. There were arcades set up that were older than me. I got to show off some serious pong skills as me and Garrick battled it out for two, intense volleys. The ball came to me, I moved my paddle down. The square ball ricocheted off my paddle and trusted its way towards Garrick. He was not prepared as the box-ball went off the screen. He was unable to return the box-ball; I was the victor.

 The tour guide, guided us to some stuff that actually pertained to films; things like the outfits some famous actors have used throughout the years. They had the fat suit from Mrs. Doubtfire, which was awesome. I remember watching that movie as a kid and watching the scene where they created the fat suit for Robin Williams to wear. When I saw it, I had to touch it. That didn’t go to well, as the tour guide let out a contained shriek "don't touch anything".... the story of my life. It was worth it though.

   After that display, I realized that I had the misfortune to start the tour with the commercialism display and then made our way to the interesting and informative stuff. They had scripts from legendary movies, with famous quotes highlighted. The movie that I chose for my midterm, which I have been wanting to see for almost 2 years and have not seen it yet, had its script displayed with a powerful scene highlighted. I read it and thought about what the actors who originally read the script thought. I wondered what kind of emotions they had when they read the script, and if they had any idea of how they were going to depict the highlighted scene. It reminded me also why I picked this movie and why I have wanted to see this movie for a long time; because it's powerful, emotional, and the message aligns with my beliefs fully. Watch Network (1976); educate yourself and you’ll know what I’m talking about.

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Super, Mega, Ultra mid term


 Salvatore Saviano
Professor Louis Lucca
Mass Media and Communication
28 October 2010

                             Woodstock: Unity, peace, love and music.


            How did Woodstock affect our society today? Well for one thing, I don’t know a single person who has attended Woodstock and claimed that it did not change their lives. “There is a Woodstock type that has to be approached in a certain way. They’re not the people carrying cellular phones, with mace in their back pockets and 400$ c.d players in their 300$ running suits” (1). To me this speaks volumes. You have your 1920’s-50’s persona that wears suits and ties. How many suit and ties did you see at Woodstock? The answer is zero. More people were nude then dressed nice. How many people do you see every day, walking down the street, wearing a suit and tie? I would say one out of two hundred people would be a fair.  The reason being; were observing a generation that broke the old traditions and made there own. The people who came out of the sixties generation were radically different then any other generation prior. With the introduction of rock and its “pervasiveness”, we saw the evolution of our society occur quicker then ever before.
We saw a culture that no longer believed every thing that they were told. No longer were the masses listening to every piece of propaganda handed to them.  People began thinking for themselves, and not allowing the U.S government to think for them. Citizens all across the nation all realized at once, they had a voice and it will be heard. The right to protest and the right to gather would be on display through out the sixties and was capped off with the largest musical gathering/ mass protest in history; Woodstock. Those who attended Woodstock, the baby boom generation, would discover a higher level of spirituality that left a indelible mark on the world forever.
The baby boomers believed that there was some thing missing in our lives; peace, love, and music. They knew that there was a force in the universe stronger then us, stronger then the government, and stronger then even the dollar. Love and spirituality was not only a theme at Woodstock; it was a palpable force that was felt by all who attended, never to be forgotten, and forever changed their lives.
The music that played at Woodstock was legendary; no rock venue before or since Woodstock has ever come close to the amount of people that attended. There were over 500,000 people at Woodstock 1969 (3). That’s hard to believe, I know. It is even harder to imagine. When I watched the footage from Woodstock: my jaw dropped in disbelief. “It looked like an army invaded” (2). Watching the footage myself I had to agree.
The highways were closed. It was the biggest traffic jam in the history of roads (1). People were abandoning their cars, and walking on foot because there was no end to the traffic. The venue planned on holding 20,000(3). They could never imagine that half a million people were coming from all over the country to watch this concert, which was barely promoted, and took nine months to scrounge up sponsors (1). They stopped charging people for entry at that point. They obviously couldn’t accommodate that many people or keep them from entering the first rock concert ever to be held on a dairy farm in Bethel, New York ; so they rented out all the land they could in and around the concert so every one could get a view of the show. This tactic isn’t the most profitable alternative, but the anti corporation vibe was undeniable at Woodstock. Money didn’t matter, not when you have three days of peace, love and music.
            This kind of generosity was a characteristic of the baby boom generation. These new age humans were operating on a more spiritual level, quit different then that of any previous generation. This can be attributed in part to the influence of one mind altering chemical; L.S.D. Lysergic acid diethylamide is a powerful, mind altering hallucinogenic that was used not only by those who attended Woodstock, but the performers as well. “It enhanced the spiritual experience. It made the music visible, the vibrations palpable, and every one felt connected” (4 Holt). “No one could complain about the kids; ‘it was sir this’, ‘sir that’ and ‘thank you this’ and ‘thank you that’. No one could complain about the kids“(2) . Even though L.S.D was made illegal for its “dangerous” effects, it most certainly contributed to the lack of violence at the event. The effects of L.S.D didn’t only enhance the spiritual experience of Woodstock, but it was responsible for the feelings of peace and serenity at the event that can still be felt today if you were to visit that dairy farm in Bethel,  New York.
The utilities were practically non existent. There were simply not enough porter potties for every one to use, so naturally there was an excess amount of fecal matter present at the event. There was not enough food or water either; many people in the town and who attended the event had very little food available to them. “I had to eat corn flakes for two days because I couldn’t go into town to get any food”(2).  A large portion of the attendees did not bring enough food and water for the three day event, but in the presence of unity and love; it was impossible to not be charitable and ignore a fellow human in need; Mike Vitiello, art director of BBDO worldwide was 19 when he attended Woodstock. He fortunately had a father that worked for the Nabisco biscuit company and send him and his friends a trunk full of crackers and cheese. They distributed it all at the event “What stands out most for me is that feeling every one was in this together, cooperating. There was no ‘hey get out of my face’ attitude” (3). There was a barn that served rice, vegetables, water and cabbage to any one that was in need (4). There was a universal feeling of happiness at Woodstock that has never since been replicated. Every one wanted the best for every one else around them and did not care who they were. For three days; racism, hatred, war and negativity didn’t exist. Poverty was alive and kicking, but it didn’t matter. Every one was thinking about every one else, so they didn’t have to think about themselves. The attendees were not the only ones to feel the groovy vibes at Woodstock; the legendary and iconic performers were forever changed during that 3 day festival as well.
            The greatest rock bands of its era performed at Woodstock. Never again in history has such a diverse collage of musicians joined together in not only music, but in beliefs as well, and played at a venue of that size. Some of the greatest musicians ever had there iconic status fortified at Woodstock. There was a new sound in music. Not just the revolutionary lyrics, but revolutionary sound as well. Woodstock showcased the sound of the overdriven guitar, which was used by many of the performers and had not been showcased before.
            Jimmy Hendrix closed Woodstock, and was probably the most remembered figure at the entire event. Every one knows Jimmy Hendrix played at Woodstock. I have seen the references in pop culture dozens of times in my short history on this earth. Even though Jimmy Hendrix didn’t have more then one hit song, he played a song that would go down in rock history; the Star Spangled Banner to an overdriven guitar. When Jimmy Hendrix started playing the anthem, the whole crowd grew silent and simply took it all in, and no one forgot it. Not even those who were born after Woodstock. That performance has been immortalized, and referenced to in pop culture more then any other single performance that I can recall. When I first started playing the guitar, I was inspired to learn that song as soon as I could and I had never considered myself a Jimmy Hendrix fan, but that is the kind of power Jimmy’s guitar had; even after 30 years his performance is remembered.
            For some one with out much commercial success, Jimmy Hendrix is one of the most iconic figures of that era. In our world, Jimmy Hendrix is one of the most recognized musical figures ever. He did outlandish things while playing the guitar that people were just not used to seeing. He would pick up his guitar and play with his teeth, he would break his guitar after his performance, and he produced a sound that was rare and hypnotic. His songs may not have made it in the top 10, but his musical ability was appreciated by all and forever evident. Jimmy Hendrix died a year after Woodstock on September eighth nineteen seventy, but not before cementing his legacy at Woodstock.
Hendrix was not the only icon to attend and have there names cemented in rock history at Woodstock; Janis Joplin came and sang her heart out. She was known for her passionate lyrics and even more passionate singing style. She would get on stage, her mouth would open up, her face would curl in expression and she would unleash her beautiful and thunderous voice out on the world. Her impact on the world was not just in the world of music; like other artists who attended Woodstock, Janis Joplin was some one who had strong convictions. Those convictions were to think critically for ones self. She never accepted things as they were and was always willing to fight for change if she believed in it. She believed in freedom; the right to express ones self in any way he or she pleases. She believed in equality, peace and love. She was not a commercial singer at all. She was very spiritual and understood, like most who attended Woodstock, that war and politics were not a part of peace; they were weapons to bring oppression and money. She had a beautiful voice, and she used it to express herself and let other people know that it is ok to think differently. It’s ok to think for yourself. Woodstock was not just about showcasing the amazing musicians, it was equally important for the musicians to have a stage that’s free of corruption and negativity.
Woodstock created a sub culture in America, which was radically different back then, but has now grown to become the primary culture. Society was very much segregated at the time. People were not used to individuals dressing in tie dye colors. They were not used to people walking around barefoot, playing a six string acoustic guitar. They weren’t used to hearing songs about what is wrong with the world. They were not used to hearing songs that brought attention to political and social injustices.. Society was not used to individuals thinking for themselves while simultaneously caring about others; ignoring the artificial hatred for other races and country’s that was
perpetuated by the media. Woodstock is largely responsible for shaping the youth of this country from an uptight, capitalist loving drone, into freedom loving individuals that don’t have to do what they are told; and for that I am thankful.
Mass protests were a theme through out the sixties and seventies. Never in history were the masses so unified in there beliefs that they were not being steered in the right direction. This generation let the government, corporate America, and anyone else who caused problems in their lives know how they feel. This kind of action is why today we have the freedom to protest against the powers that be and to not blindly accept corporate objectives as our ideology. Woodstock captured the music of the times in one event, but gave birth to the 70’s revolution of music. Rock ran rampant, as folk and country took a back seat. With the emergence of bands like Led Zeppelin, Iron Maiden, and Black Sabbath; rock was preparing to enter its next phase in music history.  Music was not about black and white artists, folk and country, it was about the message behind the music. Since Woodstock, it was more popular then ever to write a song about social change, feelings and experiences made an impact, and to restate ones beliefs. Music was still controlled by corporations, but the playing field had changed; it was more acceptable to be different and rebellious.
            If you were to go to a rock concert now of any popular band; you would be hard pressed to find a music group that doesn’t use an electric guitar with overdrive and tone. Its sound is as popular as capitalism. Bands like The Who, the grateful dead and Santana all played at Woodstock with overdriven guitars and are largely responsible for starting this trend. The sound was clear as they shredded there guitar strings; the crowd was
united under its melody as dance broke out throughout the crowd.  The feeling of unity that the music brought was legendary.
            Woodstock did not just change the music, but the way we enjoyed music. Concerts, by today’s standards, are largely to make money. Concerts are set up with the expectation that you will spend ten dollars for a bottle of water, and fifty dollars for a t -shirt. This marketing strategy came to fruition by observing the events at Woodstock. The
majority of the people, who attended, did not have enough food and water to last the whole event. Multiply this by 500,000 people, and you have a potential disaster on your hand. However, people fortunately chipped in where ever they could and managed to get everyone fed, but the need for services were evident. And when there’s a need; there’s money to be made. A lot of free supplies were given out at Woodstock due to emergency situations. Future concert holders made sure to learn from the mistakes at Woodstock. “At the time, Woodstock was on of the few models you could look at for massive music gatherings. Today it’s so organized. We have learned so many lessons – we’ve changed the business and production structure to better handle traffic, food and water” (3). Any concert you attend now would have security, water, food, and a venue large enough to contain a crowd. The wondrous gathering that occurred at Woodstock was magical in terms of spirituality, but a financial flop as well. The promoters actually lost money on Woodstock (3). The money was made after by the hype, the myth, and the films it spawned. This was a business mistake, and that is why concerts are what they are today; expensive and contained.
                                                                                                                       
             When Woodstock ended, it was time for people to go back to their lives. The festival of peace, love, and music was over, but the vibrations were not. The attendees who were responsible for the massive mess afterward the event, also volunteered to clean up the mess they made. People from all over the country stayed for days after the event in order to reduce their carbon foot print and give back to the earth . They understood that without the earth; harmony would never be achieved, so first and foremost, keeping her
clean was a part of the Woodstock theme.  “I stayed for three extra days cleaning up as much as I could until I couldn’t pick up one more piece of trash. I walked down the highway, stuck my thumb out and went home to Kansas” (4).
            Though there will never be another Woodstock 1969, but there were other attempts. Four more concerts were put on with the Woodstock name, but without the Woodstock soul. The vibes and helpful disposition of those who attended Woodstock would never be replicated at any other event no matter how hard the promoters tried. What happened in 1969 was magical; it was an event that captured the essence of a generation and revolutionized the music industry. It created a counter culture that prided itself, and was celebrated on the premise of non conformity. It revolutionized what it meant to be at a rock concert. It set precedence’s that have never been matched and showed future generations that there is something more powerful than money, war and the “American Dream”: Peace, love and music.




Works Cited:

(1)Denitto, Emiliy. Advertising Age. August 08, 1994. “You can’t go home again, but you can go to Woodstock”. Pg 13.

(2)"YouTube - Woodstock 1969, 3 Days of Peace & Music (Director's Cut) PART 1." YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Web. 31 Oct. 2010. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kR2TeAERVlc>.

(3)Shriver, Jerry. "Woodstock at 40: Does It Still Matter?" USA Today (2009): 1-5. Academic Search Complete. Web. 17 Oct. 2010.

(4)Holt, Mitch. Personal Interview, October 17th 2010.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Blog response.

           
I believe genetic engineering would create a separation in society. It is only natural to label someone different then ourselves as “the other”. It also depends on how different the genes are. If the “superior” humans were substantially smarter and physically better looking than people without gene manipulation, we would see that carry over into the job industry. We hire people based on looks today, why wouldn’t we do it when we have it down to a science?
In gattaca, even though the characters were labeled as “invalids”, there was enough proof to the contrary for me to believe that the label attached to being a “invalid” was invalid. The main character showed that he did not need superior genes in order to accomplish something great. Human behavior is not black and white. There are emotional factors that cannot be given value, because they are invaluable; like the will to live. If a human being wants to accomplish something, chances are they can accomplish it so long as they believe it to be possible. I don’t think science can ever predict what someone is worth. That depends on how the individual views himself. If Ethan Hawke believed he couldn’t become a astronaut, then he wouldn’t have. If he didn’t believe he would beat his brother in swimming, he wouldn’t have. Science said he couldn’t have, but he proved that the human will cannot be measured, especially with a blood test.