My Blog List

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

 In a world where there is no sun; there is only darkness. Who would choose to live in a world of darkness? In "The Matrix" the reality of their world is that there is no sun, there is no light, and there is no life. There is only cold and calculating machines that cannot express emotion, nor appreciate beauty. This dystopian world however, is cleverly hidden from the masses. The world that most people see is the Matrix and not the barren waste land that is the earth. The Matrix is a virtual reality that machines have chained humans to in order to keep them pacified. It is a capitalist world set in the late 1990's. The machines have over thrown man as the dominant species and they use humans as battery's to power them in the real world. This reality sounds horrid, but in this world it is synonymous with freedom and I would gladly accept truth over a blissful lie.
   If ever faced with an ultimatum such as; leaving the false reality that is the matrix or staying in your comfort zone, what would it be? I would want to get out of the matrix and give those machines what’s coming to them. Most characters in the movie feel the same way, but there is one who does not; Cypher. In the text "The Allegory of the Cave", Socrates describes a world not to different from the Matrix. He speaks of a cave, which is occupied by a group of men chained to the walls -they are prisoners. There perception is based off exposure and having never seen the world outside of the cave; the group is ignorant to any other reality. When one of the prisoners leaves, he finds that he cannot return to his former life as he once knew it. He was enlightened, but in turn became an outcast.
   Cypher was at one point, a prisoner of the matrix. He was freed by Morpheus, but freed is an ironic term considering Cyphers opinion of his new reality. Cypher wanted to return to the matrix very badly. He could not be happy in the "real world" because it did not have what made him happy; a world of luxury and comfort. Cypher does not care if it is not really steak, so long as his brain thinks its steak. Fighting machines was not his idea of happiness. When the opportunity presented itself; Cypher killed some of his former friends in an attempt to return to the Matrix and bring himself into a blissfully ignorant, yet happy reality.
    This movie shows how there is no reality; only perception. The cave dweller may have been exposed to the real world, but he lost his sense of identity because he could not fit in with his former prison mates. His life and perception were forever changed. Cypher gained knowledge and was exposed to the hideous truth behind his reality, but was met with unhappiness and regret. If you learn anything from this paper or the matrix; it's that we cannot decide what is best for anyone else other then ourselves. It is up to us, the individual to decide what is more important; blissful ignorance or freedom bestowing truth.

SMU blog #8: The others

 All being are made equal, or least we are told. To me, everybody has to be respected because they have unique feelings and perspectives that can prove to be insightful. However, I am not above labeling someone as different as me. What differentiates me from you or us from others is defined by the individual. Matters that I hold in high regard could be unimportant to you. That is what separates me from "others"; is the fact that I respect each individual’s perspective. I would never ask someone to conform to my belief structure and anyone who would cast their opinion as fact (like religious zealots) could not be more different than me.
 Our belief structure is put in its place during our childhood and is fortified throughout our lives. We our highly influenced as children and as we age we become more confident in our view, so what was learned as child can never be unlearned. There are some people (like those zealots) that are taught that there are no other alternatives then there beliefs.  These people often have influential figures in their lives that instill their ideology into them. I on the other hand, built my ideology around the information my eyes received and not what was told to me. I think for myself, and learn or I and anyone who believes what they are told without completely thinking it through couldn't have a more different fundamental view of the world.
  Perhaps what separates me from the others is the fact that as a child I never had any one telling me what to make of the world. I was blessed with the ability to think about what was presented in front of me and to not blindly accept anything. I believe that if more people in the world were taught less about how to think as children and instead instilled with the tools necessary to think for themselves; we would have a more open minded and tolerant society because respect for others point of view is what will unite the world instead of intolerance keeping us apart.
 All my life I have experienced discrimination because of my belief that every ones perspective deserves respect. In school, if someone was getting made fun of for being different, I would be the first person to jump in and defend them. This immediately created a division between the two parties; me and the victim vs. everyone else. I didn't necessarily like the victim or agree with what he had to say. All I had to know what that the law of my life, respect, was being violated. Others who didn't understand or embrace this philosophy would interpret it as disrespect or as an offence. I quickly got used to this role of "the other" and would seek out friends who shared a similar way of thinking to me in order to bring some sense of comfort that I am not the only one who thinks this way. However, once a connection is established with a like minded individual, I find that it’s rewarding and worth the discrimination. To me, it is about quality over quantity.
 To make it simple respect others ideology. Ideology is defined as "A is a set of ideas that constitutes one's goals, expectations, and actions" and since no two children are raised the same it is highly unlikely that there will be another individual who perceives things the exact same way you will. If we don't learn to respect others viewpoints; it’s going to be a long, lonely life filled with discrimination and confusion. But if we learn that there is no right or wrong and only our perception, we will see how much easier it is to get along with everyone else. We should look at every one else as "brother" and not the "other".

Monday, October 18, 2010

Super, mega, ultra rough draft outline and bibliography

Thesis Statement: Woodstock epitomized the cultural revolution in 1969 and had a strong influence on all generations following.

Topic Sentences:  - The gathering of millions to view one concert, despite any factors like race or age, united to participate in a music event.

- Drug use was common at the event, heavy psychedelic drugs were used. These drugs were part of this experience and started a world wide trend.

-         Artists, from all genres, countries and ethnic backgrounds united to play at this concert.

-         Woodstock affected society afterward. This coincided with the baby boom generation.

-         First event of a new rock genre to be played live. It spawned many icons like Jimi Hendrix and Janice Joplin.

-         Showcased the revolution of the sound of the guitar.


Bibliography:


 http://www.youtube.com/. 2010. Web. 10-18-2010.

        http://www.woodstockstory.com/passingperformersbands.html  2010. Web. 10-18-2010

        www.squidoo.com/woodstock_69  Squido 2010. Web . 10-18-2010

Monday, October 11, 2010

Super, Mega, Ultra Heroic blog #6


           Here is a scenario you may have never thought about: if a plane crashed right in front of you with people trapped inside and the ship was on fire, would you attempt to save the crew? Would you knowingly risk your own life for the life of strangers in peril? This is the exact scenario Bernie Laplante was faced with, and he decided to go in the plane and risk it all in the movie "Hero". Bernie Laplante is a low life, two bit con artist who would steal candy from a baby if he had the chance, but with a twist of fate, he was presented with the opportunity to become a hero.

The movie shows us how any man, no matter what reputation he has, is capable of selfless acts of heroism. It also shows how Gayle Gayley, a media reporter, portrays such an event and the mutation any story undergoes in the media. The movie shows in contrast, the heroic acts of a horrible man, and the dishonest act of a brave and honorable man. With Bernie performing the heroic act and John Bubber receiving the adoration, you are allowed to see the very best and worst of human behavior. It shows cases the ambitions of members in our society, and how we prioritize decency and ethics.

 In any modern society, money is essential to survival. Without money, we cannot survive. Bernie Laplante is some one who is desperate for money and does many despicable things in order to gain it. He is showed stealing from his court appointed lawyer, after she already lent him money. He is later seen taking money from a lost wallet and leaving a diner through the back exit to avoid paying for it. He tries to sell any thing he can get his hands on, and taking any thing that isn't chained down. His apartment is shown to have miscellaneous items ranging from printer paper to watches that he attempts to sell to his landlord. He is some one who would not hesitate to steal in order to provide for himself. He works for a rug cleaning company, and he is habitually late. He hands his boss an excuse every time he comes in late. It is hard for people to respect Bernie when he conducts himself in such a disingenuous manner. No one expected him to risk his life for any one else.

            En route to see his son, Bernie witnessed a plane crashing at his feet. With his path blocked by the fiery plane, Bernie got out of his car to inspect the accident and he heard the cries of the passengers on board. They begged him to open up the door from the outside, which he reluctantly did, but that was not all that was asked of him. A boy who looked about his sons age asked him to find his father and bring him to safety outside of the air craft. After a couple of profane remarks, Bernie enters the plane; unfortunately Bernie couldn't find the boy’s father, for he had already escaped. But there were other passengers that needed Bernie's assistance

He was accosted by people in need who also needed to convince him to save them. One was Gayle Gayley, who he saw trapped in between seats. The opportunist in Bernie came out as he couldn't help but take Gayle’s purse with out her knowing during the rescue.  As soon as Gayle was safe, the reporter in her kicked in. She found herself concerned with the story behind the rescue, and not with the passenger’s health, or with what caused the accident. Her ambitions were to capture and sensationalize the tragedy that just befallen her, but Bernie was no where to be found. She was left with no hero to match her story. Bernie continued venturing towards his son's house to do what he set out to do before the plane crash; spend time with his son before he goes to jail.

Unfortunately, his ex-wife sees him as a bad role model for their son and wants to protect her son from his poisonous behavior. Unable to see his son, or make any progress with his ex, Bernie ventures back to his home and along the way meets a homeless man who lives in a Van; John Bubber. John and Bernie share stories about there night. Unknown to Bernie was the amount of attention and publicity his venture had created. He had only one shoe left from the fire, and decided to give it to John, because John told him he knew of some one with one leg that could benefit from the shoe. You can see how Bernie's concern is primarily concerned with him self, where John thinks only of others.

            Meanwhile, Gayle was at the hospital with the other victims of the crash. She asked all members of the air plane about the hero behind the rescue, but she could not figure out who it was. All that remained of the hero was a shoe.  She began covering the story, dubbing the hero as an "angel" who appeared and vanished as quickly as he appeared. The true identity and facts behind the "angel" was a mystery and thanks to the media, the perception behind this figure was that of a larger then life saint figure who cared not for himself, but for others

Bernie Laplante obviously did not fit this metaphorical shoe, but John Bubber did.  After hearing that there will be a million dollar reward for the hero, Bubber comes forward with the literal shoe left behind in the crash and receives the award that should rightfully have went to Laplante. With out any proof to the contrary, and his obvious disposition towards every one else, Laplante found it impossible to convince any one else that he was the angel behind the story and that Bubber is a fake. Further investigating showed that Bubber is a Vietnam War Veteran who saved his platoon while serving in the war. This further reinforced the image that Bubber is the angel, making it harder for Laplante to convince any one otherwise.


            Was it wrong for Bubber to come forward and accept the reward that doesn't belong to him? Who can say? The situation is not black and white. He did many selfless acts while receiving little to no reward in the past; shouldn't he receive some sort of compensation for such acts? Unfortunately in our society we don't reward kindness. For the most part, it is those who prey on others and take advantage of opportunities that end up successful, where those who think about others are not left with any one to think about themselves. So why shouldn’t Bubber have thought about himself for once and receive a little help even if he is lying?  Bubber himself said he just wanted to sleep in a bed and have a warm meal; his ambitions were modest. What he ended up receiving was fame and the adoration of millions across the country.

He became a national celebrity over night, while the true hero, Bernie Laplante, was left to piece together his broken life and continue bottom feeding. With Gayle and the news station she worked for backing him up,  Bubber toured across the state meeting and greeting any one, ranging from admirers to hospitalized children. When ever the opportunity presented itself, Bubber always lent a helping hand to the needy, while Laplante was hunting him down in an attempt to expose him and claim what’s rightfully his. The story is showing in contrast the good nature of Bubber, and the stereotypical disposition of Laplante and how differently they operate.

 Eventually the guilt was too much for Bubber to handle; he threatened to kill himself by jumping off of a building. He was ridden with guilt, and wanted desperately to alleviate the stress he put on himself by taking credit for some thing he did not do. Laplante had come to terms with what kind of person Bubber was and let go of his anger. He realized Bubber was a genuinely nice guy who only wanted to help others, while Laplante was a scheming con artist who couldn't care less about the well being of others. With this in mind, Laplante confronted Bubber on the ledge of the skyscraper and resolved the conflict. He informed Bubber that he did not care about the fame or the admiration, and just wanted some of the money. He knew that Bubber was not only the right image for the story, but the right man to be admired. Even though Laplante rightfully deserves it, he realizes he is not the kind of person that the masses would accept as a hero, and chooses to remain anonymous in return for some of the benefits.


            I like to believe if faced with such a crisis, that most people would rise to the occasion, but how many others actually would? The characters in the movie showcase how self centered we can all be. It showed that in the face of a heroic act our instincts are to pervert such a story for the sake of sensationalism. Rather then billing the rescue as a random act of kindness, the media spun the story sensational act performed by a saint. Dubbing who ever saved the passengers as an "angel", and not just a man. It was impossible for Laplante to be heralded as a saint, but Bubber matched perfectly. Rather then integrity and ethics, we see personal ambitions take center stage in "Hero”, the very worst and best in our society.

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Super Mega Ultra Revision: The Matrix Analysis

  In a world where there is no sun, there is only darkness. Who would choose to live in a world of darkness? In "The Matrix" the reality of there world is that there is no sun, there is no light, and there is no life. There are only cold, calculating machines that cannot express emotion, nor appreciate beauty. This dystopian world how ever, is cleverly hidden from the masses. The world that most people see is the Matrix and not the barren waste land that is the earth. The Matrix is a virtual reality that machines have chained humans to in order to keep them pacified. It is a capitalist world set in the late 1990's. The machines have over thrown man as the dominant species and they use humans as battery's to power themselves in the real world. This reality sounds horrid, but in this world it is synonymous with freedom and I would gladly accept truth over a blissful lie.
   If ever faced with an ultimatum such as leaving the false reality that is the matrix or staying in your comfort zone, what would it be? I would want to get out of the matrix and give those machines what’s coming to them. Most characters in the movie feel the same way, but there is one who does not; Cypher. In the text "The Allegory of the Cave", Socrates describes a world not to different from the Matrix. He speaks of a cave, which is occupied by a group of men chained to the walls -they are prisoners. There perception is based off exposure and having never seen the world outside of the cave; the group is ignorant to any other reality. When one of the prisoners leaves, he finds that he cannot return to his former life as he once knew it. He was enlightened, but in turn became an outcast. I wonder; would he exchange his new found enlightened perception for his comfortable, ignorant, old one? It would have to be a possibility first; we cannnot unlearn something. But Cypher had that luxury.
   Cypher was at one point, a prisoner of the matrix. He was freed by Morpheus, but freed is an ironic term considering Cyphers opinion of his new reality. Cypher wanted to return to the matrix very badly. He made a deal with the machines to return him to the Matrix. He could not be happy in the "real world". Even though the Matrix was a digital world, it felt real enough for Cypher. He desired a world of luxury and comfort. Cypher does not care if it is not really steak, so long as his brain thinks its steak. Fighting machines was not his idea of happiness. When the opportunity presented itself; Cypher killed some of his former friends in an attempt to return to the Matrix and bring himself into a blissfully ignorant, yet happy reality.
    This movie shows how there is no reality; only perception. The cave dweller may have been exposed to the real world, but he lost his sense of identity because he could not fit in with his former prison mates. His life and perception were forever changed. Cypher gained knowledge and was exposed to the hideous truth behind his reality, but was met with unhappiness and regret. If you learn any thing from this paper or the matrix; it's that we cannot decide what is best for any one else other then ourselves. It is up to us, the individual to decide what is more important; blissful ignorance or freedom bestowing truth.

Blog 5, super. mega, ultra brainstorming session:

 Potential topics:

 - Elvis Presley - Changed rock music. Incorporated sex appeal, and crossed over into movies. He became a icon for decades.

 - Jimmy Hendrix-  Was the first musician to experiment with tone, and overdrive effectively changing the way conventional guitar was heard and paved the way for modern musicians.

 - Howard Stern - Coined the term "shock jockey" by airing explecit and often perverse material on the radio. Angered millions while entertaining millions. Was forced out of public radio due to complaints so he moved to private radio (XM) and has since then inspired others to fight against censorship.

 - Ted turner- Created CNN. First cable television network.

What is the importance of the topic in the evolution of mass media

  It is important because tommorows innovations will be based off of yesterdays breakthroughs. We must realize that there was a deeper history to what is presented infront of us as every day norms in order to further evolve.

What kind of position will you develop in the paper?

  I will develop a realistic, and accurate portrayal of Howard Stern and his influence on the radio and the public.  My personal opinion of him is not the most positive, but nearly every one in the modern world has heard of him, and there in lies the reason why he is so famous.

What kind of sources will be available and what will be the best sources to use?

 There was a movie made about him, the internet has countless entries, as well as a long list of people who have crusaded against him. There is a broad range of opinions about him and I can't wait to present mine.

 INCOMPLETE

Blog 4: Super, mega, ultra reflection:

 What have  you learned about writing academics so far?

 I learned that writing is a process. Before, I relied heavily on my mind to organize and produce facts. I would think about one topic and let it flow from my brain, to my pen.  It was the most comfortable way for me, but after being exposed to better writings and new techniques to gather information, I am trying to change my ways. I learned that I’m a good writer, but I have a long way to go before I am a great writer.


 Did these concepts connect with things you already know and how did you make these connections?
 I was aware of concepts like thesis, topic sentences, myths and main ideas,  but I did not know the exact definition to them. Also,  I never actually wrote a outline to a essay, clustered, or brain stormed on paper—ever.  I have not wrote a essay utilizing those techniques, but I can’t wait. I am excited to see just how much I have improved by incorporating those techniques into my writing. I now see the importance in gathering facts to present an argument.  Not just present it in a manner in which the audience will understand, but to allow the audience to come to a logical conclusion on their own by simply presenting the data in a well organized composition.

 
If some thing was unfamiliar, how did you approach it?
 I had never written a formal summary before. I didn’t know how to make one and the non personalized concept seemed to deviate from my writing style, but I analyzed it further and asked some more educated people about it  and I see that we humans summarize things on a daily basis. Some people describe stories in summary format, and some people only recall events from a personal perspective. Facts are the most important part of any argument, and now I see how we subconsciously use these writing techniques in our speech and everyday lives.  This has helped me achieve a greater understanding of writing as a process, and the importance of each step involved with presenting a thesis.

 What is still puzzling you about these writing concepts?

 Nothing, and if there was, we would have discussed it till I got it.

What are you not sure of regarding them?


 Nothing.

 What did you think of your interaction with ena99? Does such interaction make blogging more meaningful to you or not?

 I enjoyed commenting on other classes blogs. It allowed me to see how different writing styles can be and showed  me from a teachers perspective what to look for when critiquing another person’s writing. This in turn helped me become a better writer. I feel like it made the blogging experience more enjoyable. I personally feel like I am doing more than presenting a argument when I write a essay, but also entertaining my reader.  Interacting with other blogs created the sensation that others were reading my writings as well, and not just for the purpose of receiving a good grade.

 How was writing to some one in another class different then commenting on a classmates blog?
 
 It was different because I could not see the other person. They were not watching me, waiting for me to post my comment so they could see what I thought. It allowed me to focus more on judging the work based on criteria, and judge it more objectively with out taking any personal feelings into consideration.

 Did trying to critique some one elses work  make you more confident that you know the criteria for a good summary?

 Definitely. In martial arts, the student becomes the teacher, and vice versa. It is a cycle that continues as long as you wish to learn martial arts because you are consistently looking at the same thing with a different perspective. It hones your skills and promotes growth. This is a useful tool for learning, and it worked great for writing.

 Area of reflection of your choice: What else would you like to share with us?
When I came into this school, I had quite low expectations.  Based on what I heard; I didn’t expect the teachers to be nice, care about the students, speak proper English, or treat me with respect.  I didn’t go to high school so my perception of school was based on here say. From my experience with the registering process, this did not seem that unlikely. Now that I have attended school, I can say that I am pleasantly surprised. I mean, I’m sure I will encounter mean, pompous teachers who don’t treat students with respect, but I’m glad they aren’t in this cluster.